From owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 29 00:00:15 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-testing@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51381230
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:00:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-f53.google.com (mail-qa0-f53.google.com
 [209.85.216.53])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D09F271A
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:00:14 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v10so8521503qac.40
 for <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
 :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=gy+VU5iwmfwqHSwjt4sE/eUkN6gL3JStKgV0g4uwnMk=;
 b=QbLQGASMj5wbdWhB4APlRF/8qoBIrSp70JivsjkMxCcWojGaP/XscwUa+z1oIb0DGk
 17oqOnyc/KUjl/aANvdIVZv92QrZBxIcwgU+j0ABGWouuajn6TJMiyFUG097XrQkkQsy
 lPAhqyDbK+unmw7KjxZnjUsIrdUvcK8JxmF22+yyZg0udGclZliH5jQ3rfqpdCULMyKs
 ugmUylbaiw1LAz6V33dQLrhBLCEXpK0vuKhG8EQIjZKqVK/fdvPpOzGzcaH0/jlLMNnM
 dx//7Qcja6Qr4yNfZZ4imOzO4BwaWGimc3qBv0qqzdGzKaLqgyCsWpwO2vDgeZ0KGP73
 9MkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmZ8yqxE5OJ4vZyH0cwCgfruVUvaC+BdiO2uAXt92KxU25IPEwZglLyfA2mjrDwc5EXg3cw
X-Received: by 10.224.26.146 with SMTP id e18mr5271861qac.13.1406592008725;
 Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:00:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jmmv@meroh.net
Received: by 10.96.83.99 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2620:0:1008:100a:1cf4:b8ab:9755:55fa]
In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2i3L0vug4zFmd7T7qHZf6ms+pQcHqr-YsGrF-v5By5-uA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5ee51891.12b049e9@fabiankeil.de>
 <CAOtMX2j=NMyacDw8gV=N7eS07G5SJ_bL=ktPDDHVGC7QFc9M9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <450da50a.02ce9897@fabiankeil.de>
 <CAOtMX2i6ziW+WqQ2jcRWNesNOFbiat2psEi8bvb0qTb2=93ukg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFY7cWAQEvAHeNO-yugneEbsYsntZaEz=ruthSeZ+Xjcz_xbTA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOtMX2i3L0vug4zFmd7T7qHZf6ms+pQcHqr-YsGrF-v5By5-uA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:59:48 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: hzPAHXohrRhzZOfQHNNqGwCTvbE
Message-ID: <CAFY7cWCpn0eUGKvnzGrNuhtomSMuTa=a6gOhk3gUCGosCjYCgg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Missing atf-check output: example:failing_test -> failed:
 atf-check failed; see the output of the test for details
To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Testing on FreeBSD <freebsd-testing.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-testing@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-testing>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-testing-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 00:00:15 -0000

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> I just haven't thought about a UI for it.  Maybe "kyua report
>> --show-output [test cases]" would be good enough?
>
> How about "kyua report --verbose".  Seems more conventional.

Note that we already have --show-context.  The side-effect of adding a
--verbose flag would imply subsuming the functionality of
--show-context into it, which in turns means that querying a single
test case would show both the output of the test case plus the
context.

Not a bad idea now that I think about it, but just saying.