From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 15:09:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 994DC16A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:09:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sollube.sarenet.es (sollube.sarenet.es [192.148.167.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A7743D4C for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:09:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from borjamar@sarenet.es) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (borja.sarenet.es [192.148.167.77]) by sollube.sarenet.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A2B15; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:09:55 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <420F5B53.4010301@withagen.nl> References: <20050202121151.GA91729@hal9000.halplant.com> <420F5B53.4010301@withagen.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Borja Marcos Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:10:00 +0100 To: Willem Jan Withagen X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Devilator - performance monitoring for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:09:57 -0000 > Wait until you would like to do a larger server park. Then you start > running into performance issues because you nee to setup a full > ssh/tcp connection. Whereas SNMP-v3 over UDP is a lot faster and > simpler. And it is not like you are transporting majore security type > data???? Well, I've been using orcallator and Orca to monitor 20+ Solaris servers for some years, and a small Sun Netra T1 is capable of keeping up with the data. The good thing about using an agent in each machine is that you get more consistent info. BTW, it will be released his week. I'm completing the network statistics, and testing on i386 and sparc64. Borja.