From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 30 00:52:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A827816A4CE; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:52:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from philomath.unixcore.com (dev.unixcore.com [81.191.64.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA3643D39; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@philomath.unixcore.com) Received: from philomath.unixcore.com (daniel@localhost.unixcore.com [127.0.0.1])i9U0qJPf089602; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:52:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from daniel@philomath.unixcore.com) Received: (from daniel@localhost) by philomath.unixcore.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9U0qIKO089586; Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:52:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from daniel) Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 02:52:18 +0200 From: Daniel Bond To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20041030005218.GA81412@philomath.unixcore.com> References: <20041029022056.GA5751@philomath.unixcore.com> <200410291445.51216.jhb@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410291445.51216.jhb@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on philomath.unixcore.com cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: How to disable ACPI in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:52:08 -0000 thanks for clearing this up for me, pcib0 seems to be a child of legacy0. Yet my system hangs.. I'm moving my Hi-Point ata100 controller in a 4.8 box instead, so this system becomes stable. On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 02:45:51PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > you can run devinfo to list your device tree. If pcib0 is a child of acpi0, > then you are using ACPI. If it is a child of legacy0, then you aren't. > On Thursday 28 October 2004 10:20 pm, Daniel Bond wrote: > > Yet, still I find ACPI in my kernel: