From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 21:03:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58EF1106566C for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay0.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [178.250.72.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C4708FC0A for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:03:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (unknown [78.86.207.85]) by relay0.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F5757023; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:30:38 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Mark Blackman In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:29:58 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7B54F8CE-9CA5-4C06-B3D8-F365A67A5300@exonetric.com> References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <4FCF9C07.2000607@FreeBSD.org> To: Wojciech Puchar X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) Cc: Mark Felder , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 21:03:26 -0000 On 17 Jun 2012, at 21:13, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>=20 >> Clang is consistently faster at compiling than GCC and it is very = clean and modular -- not bloated. >=20 > -r-xr-xr-x 3 root wheel 37025016 12 cze 21:46 /usr/bin/clang >=20 > well.. hope you just left the debugging symbols in and statically linked it=85 - Mark=