Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 11:53:57 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Petr Holub <hopet@ics.muni.cz> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, sam@inf.enst.fr, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: gnat-glade build error on 6.0-BETA2 Message-ID: <20050818155357.GA94253@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <200508181550.j7IFogA13464@dior.ics.muni.cz> References: <20050818152509.GA7515@xor.obsecurity.org> <200508181550.j7IFogA13464@dior.ics.muni.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 05:50:42PM +0200, Petr Holub wrote: > > It's bogus to use CFLAGS (C compiler flags) to control an ADA > > compiler. Users may legitimately specify any number of other C > > compiler flags in this variable which will be rejected by the ADA > > compiler. Use another variable instead (e.g. ADAFLAGS). >=20 >=20 > OK, based on your suggestion (ADACFLAGS), I've just sent two PR's with pa= tches I said ADAFLAGS (by analogy to the other variable names, CXXFLAGS, FFLAGS, etc); I don't know what ADACFLAGS would stand for :) Kris --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDBK8VWry0BWjoQKURAp0cAJ9z3W3R69Dgg1NmYFcs6P+yLS5FjwCfY/AH u7JW4rUHnDj8HDo9gyveWBU= =viXB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050818155357.GA94253>