From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 12 14:12:07 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA20809 for isp-outgoing; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wopr.inetu.net (wopr.inetu.net [207.18.13.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA20802 for ; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 14:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dev@localhost) by wopr.inetu.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA09738; Tue, 12 Aug 1997 17:17:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 12 Aug 1997 17:17:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Dev Chanchani To: Victor Sudakov cc: freebsd isp mailing list Subject: Re: bulk mailer In-Reply-To: <199708101242.UAA01414@vas.tomsk.su> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk You know, some time ago, I remember people bashing the web because a lot of "newbies" got on the net. Would it be fair to say why do we include a web server with FreeBSD? I hate spam. I even setup a site SpamSucks.com (which I had to kill due to lack of time). But I beleive in a persons right to leave that decision up to themselves. I don't believe we should bring such politics into freebsd and act as a judge for what ports are included and what ports are not. I think this program has a right to be there. Regards, Dev On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Hello Colleagues. > > Do you think it was a wise idea to include a bulk mailer into the ports > collection? It looks like encouraging spammers. > > > -- > Victor Sudakov > http://www.tomsk.su/r/persons/vas.htm > > >