From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 00:12:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B0837B401; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:12:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5E343FCB; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:12:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5A7Ch5h048645; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:12:43 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5A7Chmc048644; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:12:43 +0400 (MSD) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:12:43 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= To: Alexey Zelkin Message-ID: <20030610071243.GA48574@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200306100122.h5A1MVsN035570@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030610095151.A6344@phantom.cris.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030610095151.A6344@phantom.cris.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc Makefile locale.alias locale.deprecated nls.alias X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:12:46 -0000 On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:51:51 +0300, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > I object to this change. Or actually to way how it's done. Since > you have removed locale.deprecated stuff then users who upgrading from > 4.x or previous 5.x will be left with old (deprecated) locales available. > Since you also removed compat code from libc people will stick with > correct locales available, but those will not be understanding by libc > locale stuff (nl_langinfo(), etc). It will lead to many potential > problems to those who still using old locales. There is nothing to object at this time. This change in its current form was announced and discussed very long ago, when new naming scheme was introduced for the first time. Few years of transition period (now ended) are enough for users to put correct value to the LANG variable. What you suggest is just another transition period, it is superfluous. > is appropriate and note in UPDATING and HEADSUP to -current and > -ports would be enough to warn people. UPDATING note submitted today, HEADSUP was anounced few years ago.