From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 23 19:48:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3536E106566B; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1C78FC0C; Mon, 23 May 2011 19:48:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:19ad:a219:aff6:b6b4] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:19ad:a219:aff6:b6b4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25DDD5C37; Mon, 23 May 2011 21:48:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4DDABA18.2000901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 21:48:40 +0200 From: Dimitry Andric Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.18pre) Gecko/20110519 Lanikai/3.1.11pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <201105221632.p4MGWjUb081825@svn.freebsd.org> <20110522202256.GA43412@freebsd.org> <20110522213058.GB21144@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110522213058.GB21144@lonesome.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r222183 - head/lib/clang X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 19:48:34 -0000 On 2011-05-22 23:30, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 10:22:56PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: >> The problem here is deeper in my opinion. What FreeBSD calls >> amd64 the rest of the world (ie. linux) calls x86_64, I think >> that instead of this we should teach llvm/clang about "amd64". >> Maybe as a FreeBSD-only diff. > > If we move away from "amd64", we are going to need a _substantial_ amount > of work on ports. Note, this commit was *only* to set clang's compiled-in default arch on amd64, to make sure clang selects the correct target CPU when it generates code. This should not influence too many configure scripts, unless they foolishly grep around in "$CC -v" output... ;)