From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jun 28 9:15:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CED37B6F2 for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:15:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@fw.wintelcom.net) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e5SGFAl29887; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:15:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2000 09:15:09 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Jesper Skriver , Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft updates mount change (17 Jun) Message-ID: <20000628091509.V275@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <200006272212.PAA36120@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> <20000628094841.D77839@skriver.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Wed, Jun 28, 2000 at 05:09:07PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Dag-Erling Smorgrav [000628 08:11] wrote: > Jesper Skriver writes: > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > > Would we be interested in doing this? > > It has been discussed several times over the last week or so, and Kirk > > had good arguments for not doing it - the mail archive is your friend. > > s/week/year/. This has been discussed many times, and while the > current solution (fs flag) is not particularly elegant, it is the > lesser evil. IMO there's nothing wrong with mount doing what tunefs does, setting the softdep bit before actually mounting it, changing it while mounted would not be supported. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message