From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Sep 30 9:40:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 215FB37B40D for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 09:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4598 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Sep 2001 16:39:57 +0000 (GMT) To: barney@databus.com Cc: jgreco@ns.sol.net, swear@blarg.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 127/8 continued From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:53:37 -0400" References: <20010928235337.A94406@tp.databus.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 18:39:57 +0200 Message-ID: <4596.1001867997@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Despite all that, I've never seen a fixed point-to-point circuit > that was not a /30 if it landed on its own interface at the ISP's > router. The exceptions are all multiplexed/channeled at the ISP. > I'm not sure RFC3021 is out there in the real Internet yet. > Has anyone seen a T1 or better provisioned as a /31? Yep, they exist. We run them on a few circuits in the backbone, at considerably higher than T1 speed. You need the right IOS version (12.0S or 12.1E works for us). Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message