From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 27 23:20:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF5310656E7 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AD68FC20 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:20:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so1310682ewy.13 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:20:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:x-authentication-warning:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=KQ2Wb59yKGS7MLb3hKjDQtQBcXOvXeJ5LcyS1i5ee3g=; b=nhaK6lzNIilB7PqeWQL/wwTMk+Keqjg3yAoms6S647mVKgPUj1nH4bbDTy82iB3MMM wZ65ye0snRIUKPfN3686t5u4u2V9/PsNuSIYUEm02odhMLo0/qR0/Fi2t0XxeJNLGFcL ghcbeh49knToGcckarkx+pLRf8faFqa5WGRsU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-authentication-warning:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; b=xJbDRRqkEfgI/kZxihLyWDiNsz7v7+mV0tZMddTHm9C2IkJjscfMuASiSydNryj3D/ QnWnMZbqKsB+PaQbo8tzVT4uf6WpU+gR0acAXogj5JFCy+FZeaCb+oTh4JiaFj7wc5S4 4WLzsWiU1EXUwD7TexaaLFcQngjCrGJ8MNjDI= Received: by 10.213.33.205 with SMTP id i13mr3937186ebd.32.1296170413686; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from darklight.org.ru ([213.132.76.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b52sm13309060eei.7.2011.01.27.15.20.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from darklight.org.ru (yuri@darklight.org.ru [IPv6:::1]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0RNK91u078287; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:20:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: (from yuri@localhost) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p0RNK9c6078286; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:20:09 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: darklight.org.ru: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:20:09 +0300 From: Yuri Pankov To: d@delphij.net Message-ID: <20110127232009.GC63800@darklight.org.ru> References: <20110127214453.GB63800@darklight.org.ru> <4D41F7B1.6050306@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D41F7B1.6050306@delphij.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: openldap-sasl-client ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 23:20:15 -0000 On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 02:54:41PM -0800, Xin LI wrote: > On 01/27/11 13:44, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Looks like dependency recording for openldap2{3,4}-sasl-client ports is > > broken again (I tried to fix it in ports/135664). I can take a look at > > How do I reproduce this? (so I would be able to test before commit? Or > it's someone else broken it?) Sorry for not providing test case, which is really simple - just install openldap24-client port with SASL option turned on and any port depending on openldap-client (i.e. gnupg): darklight.org.ru:yuri:~> pkg_info -rx gnupg Information for gnupg-2.0.16_6: Depends on: Dependency: ca_root_nss-3.12.6 Dependency: curl-7.21.3 Dependency: pth-2.0.7 Dependency: libiconv-1.13.1_1 Dependency: gettext-0.18.1.1 Dependency: libgpg-error-1.10 Dependency: libassuan-2.0.1_1 Dependency: libksba-1.1.0 Dependency: libgcrypt-1.4.6 Dependency: dirmngr-1.1.0_5 The following is probably the reason: @name openldap-sasl-client-2.4.23 @comment ORIGIN:net/openldap24-client > > fixing it again, but the real question here is - do we really need them > > now, when options are the same for -client and -server ports? > > I'm not sure if I understood what you mean -- do you mean that now that > we have OPTIONS menu for both -client ports? Nevermind the options part, I got the reason for having separate -sasl-client ports wrong, I think. > Speaking about the two different ports, I believe the real reason for > having both is to make it easier to install binary packages (we build at > FreeBSD cluster). Note that we have no preconfigured ports that uses > them though. > > I do not personally use SASL'ed OpenLDAP but I am not really sure if > it's Okay to just axe the package... Sorry if I'm totally wrong here.. My solution would be simple - make SASL option turned on by default and drop PKGSUFFIX as well as deleting the slave -sasl ports (as I see no reason for treating client or server compiled with SASL support differently, and I hope that someone could shed some light on the topic). If we are to keep the suffix, may be we could set the LATEST_LINK when adding PKGSUFFIX instead of having separate port with different origin confusing the dependency recording? > Cheers, > - -- > Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/ > FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die Yuri