From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr  6 09:16:35 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id JAA01134
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 6 Apr 1995 09:16:35 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id JAA01128
          for <current@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 6 Apr 1995 09:16:30 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id CAA26149; Fri, 7 Apr 1995 02:12:19 +1000
Date: Fri, 7 Apr 1995 02:12:19 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199504061612.CAA26149@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: ache@astral.msk.su, nnd@gw.itfs.nsk.su
Subject: Re: PERL4&5 broken in -current and 950322-SNAP!
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>>	This is very strange but on FreeBSD-1.1.5.1, FreeBSD-2.0-950210-SNAP,
>>SunOS 4.1.3 and ISC 3.0 my test program prints:

>>1
>>0

>>and only on FreeBSD-current I see:

>>1
>>0.

>I think, we still have a bug here.
>Why 1 instead of 1. ?
>And more generic why: I think it should be
>1.0
>0.0
>or return to
>1
>0
>(SunOS and ISC can be treated as some kind of standard behaviour)

Trailing `.'s and zeros aren't printf for %g format.

Bruce