From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jul 23 17:07:52 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA24738 for current-outgoing; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 17:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA24731 for ; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 17:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA27406; Wed, 23 Jul 1997 20:07:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 1997 20:07:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199707240007.UAA27406@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= Cc: Garrett Wollman , FreeBSD-current Subject: Re: 'fetch' error with http, fix wanted In-Reply-To: References: <199707232353.TAA27367@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk < said: > You are right, nothing changed (I still got error in the middle), if I > replace 1.1 with 1.0... So, it is not TCP extensions bug and not 1.1 > bug... Any ideas? My guess is still that it's some sort of TCP bug (not necessarily related to T/TCP), and in that case it's still necessary to get a tcpdump trace demonstrating the problem. Please do: # tcpdump -p -S -t -t ip host whatever.that.host.is and tcp port 80 >log and send me the log, and I'll take a look at it. (I would do so myself but I need to rebuild the kernel on my machine to add more BPF ports and that's a difficult proposition at the moment.) -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick