From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 14:56:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F06106564A for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8866D8FC19 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.156] (adsl-156-31-216.bna.bellsouth.net [70.156.31.216]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3PEsYnx095433 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Apr 2009 10:54:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru In-Reply-To: References: <200904242010.n3OKA41e084949@freefall.freebsd.org> <1240605576.2142.47.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aYlSNsujkN+AI9m2KHzP" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:54:19 -0500 Message-Id: <1240671259.1946.3.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132615: [patch] x11/libX11: work aroung parsing bug in Bash 4.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:56:43 -0000 --=-aYlSNsujkN+AI9m2KHzP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 16:42 +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Robert, good day. >=20 > Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 03:39:36PM -0500, Robert Noland wrote: > > Well, I don't actually know anything about dolt... >=20 > Here is the announcement for DOLT: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool/2008-04/msg00001.html >=20 > > but, yes this seems like it might be worthwhile. What do you > > attribute the speedup to be from? Is dolt doing a parallel build, > > while make is not? >=20 > No, as you can see from the announcement, DOLT replaces libtool for the > modern systems where you can create libraries in a few steps. > Full-blown libtool works on every platform on the expense of its speed. > DOLT minimizes the build time on the modern systems and falls back to > libtool on the systems it cannot handle natively. >=20 > So I am attributing the speedup to the DOLT itself -- it is just faster > than libtool. Hrm, ok... well I'm up for patches then... robert. --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-aYlSNsujkN+AI9m2KHzP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknzJBsACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPAxwCffGpt6aY0Cr6PCuOm29ymmdJt z4MAnRYLMQKOM7tC/L++XqTF7xE549qA =1cw2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aYlSNsujkN+AI9m2KHzP--