From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 21 05:32:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1430816A41F for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C56243D49 for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:32:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9L5WTSb014806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:32:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9L5WTnv014805; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:32:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:32:28 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Shawn Saunders Message-ID: <20051021053228.GX59364@cell.sick.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Gleb Smirnoff , Shawn Saunders , dionch@freemail.gr, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <4357D95C.3080903@freemail.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: dionch@freemail.gr, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Trying to make a Host into a gigabit hub for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 05:32:32 -0000 On Thu, Oct 20, 2005 at 09:31:15PM +0000, Shawn Saunders wrote: S> Chris, S> S> Now the traffic is going out all the ports, thanks. Only one issue, is S> that it is also being echo'd back the em0 interface. When I put this under S> a full GIGABIT load, 6 interfaces feeding back what was just sent them, S> will kill my primary em0 interface. S> S> Is there a way to make the echo from em0 to all other interfaces only go S> one-way, rather than em0 also being part of the group and receiving S> everthing it sends back again? I haven't yet understood the graph you built, but the Subject line tells me that you should use ng_hub(4), not ng_one2many(4) or ng_fec(4). -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE