From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov 10 12:41:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA26857
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:41:31 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA26837
          for <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:41:27 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id MAA16850; Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:40:23 -0800 (PST)
To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
cc: helbig@Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Newest Pentium bug (fatal) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 10 Nov 1997 18:40:10 GMT."
             <199711101840.LAA10030@usr05.primenet.com> 
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 12:40:22 -0800
Message-ID: <16846.879194422@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Perhaps if the source tree were reorganized to be more multiple
> architecture friendly, progress would speed up?

No, if we had more people with ALPHAs and who actually understood the
design of the "Miata" it would help more than anything else.  Even
with all the architecture friendliness in the world, we still wouldn't
have this key ingredient.  As usual, you're grossly oversimplifying
the problem in order to grind your usual set of axes.

					Jordan