From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Mon Mar 11 15:06:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0DA1545AB6; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAF556B232; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:06:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id C965C103A4; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:06:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:06:39 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Peter Jeremy Cc: Warner Losh , src-committers , svn-src-all , "Rodney W. Grimes" , svn-src-head , Warner Losh Subject: Re: svn commit: r344970 - head Message-ID: <20190311150639.GA1242@FreeBSD.org> References: <201903091717.x29HHjcc069618@repo.freebsd.org> <201903092000.x29K0Rf6002120@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <20190310150728.GA97029@FreeBSD.org> <20190311081644.GA87064@server.rulingia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190311081644.GA87064@server.rulingia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DAF556B232 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.985,0] X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:06:40 -0000 On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 07:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > ... > I think the changed wording implies that we no longer provide compatibity > with unsupported branches. I agree that we might in future decide to > remove COMPAT_FREEBSDx for unsupported x but until then, I'd prefer > wording along the lines of: > > "A GENERIC kernel will include suitable compatibility options to run > binaries from older branches. Note that the ability to run binaries > from unsupported branches is not guaranteed." I agree, this sounds much better: it acknowledges that some users might want to run 4.x binaries, and while we cannot guarantee it, we'd still try to provide/preserve this feature if we can. ./danfe