From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 20:08:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3084E16A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (mx.tele-kom.ru [213.80.148.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8797043D2F for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:08:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 61469 invoked by uid 555); 22 Apr 2004 07:08:10 +0400 Received: from shark (213.80.149.182) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1082603290-61441 for cpressey@catseye.mine.nu; Thu, 22 Apr 07:08:10 2004 +0400 (MSD) Received: by shark (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95D3316A; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:06:37 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 07:06:36 +0400 From: DoubleF To: Brad Knowles Message-ID: <20040422030636.GA444@Shark.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: DoubleF , Brad Knowles , Chris Pressey , freebsd-chat@freebsd.org References: <200404202124.50967.dgw@liwest.at> <20040421110548.20d8e75c.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> <6.0.1.1.1.20040421191223.03ed1a88@imap.sfu.ca> <20040421124817.5811bddb.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Chris Pressey cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Beginning C++ in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:08:14 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:45:59PM +0200, Brad Knowles probably wrote: > At 12:48 PM -0700 2004/04/21, Chris Pressey wrote: >=20 > The word virgin is distinct from chaste in English, and I'm sure=20 > that Aramaic can distinguish between them as well. The issue is not=20 > whether they could distinguish between them two thousand years ago,=20 > but what has happened since. >=20 Well, it's getting about too offtopic then... If you think C++ can be translated to C, just translate this: // one module class A { public: A(); }; A::A() { /* some code here */ } static A a; // another module, which doesn't know about the former's existance int main(void) { /* some other code here */ } --=20 DoubleF Our policy is, when in doubt, do the right thing. -- Roy L. Ash, ex-president Litton Industries --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAhza7wo7hT/9lVdwRAnSlAJ46Eth41rwcAkBw2b9RzHHDmr+M1QCfTCMY XJDwchYUolVJMKqftVxidI0= =v/LP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--