Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:12:26 +0100
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@FreeBSD.org>, "dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org" <dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org>, "dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org" <dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: git: bc9e19dce0ab - main - Fix buildworld with gcc 12 after llvm-19 import
Message-ID:  <4740E6A9-B104-46C5-AB19-9C5F2BF66AA3@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4af71fad-407d-48f2-aec4-f6c50fa72c1f@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <202410251608.49PG8pSI044793@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <4af71fad-407d-48f2-aec4-f6c50fa72c1f@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 28 Oct 2024, at 20:56, John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
> On 10/25/24 12:08, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> The branch main has been updated by dim:
>> URL: =
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3Dbc9e19dce0abee80750e6fa04aaf9798=
73bfe0d2
>> commit bc9e19dce0abee80750e6fa04aaf979873bfe0d2
>> Author:     Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
>> AuthorDate: 2024-10-25 16:07:59 +0000
>> Commit:     Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
>> CommitDate: 2024-10-25 16:08:32 +0000
>>     Fix buildworld with gcc 12 after llvm-19 import
>>          Unfortunately gcc 12's is not yet capable of compiling all =
of libc++
>>     19's C++23 code, which results in errors similar to:
>>            =
/usr/src/freebsd/src/contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/__algorithm/range=
s_contains.h:41:3: error: 'static constexpr bool =
std::__1::ranges::__contains::__fn::operator()(_Iter, _Sent, const =
_Type&, _Proj)' must be a non-static member function
>>          41 |   operator()(_Iter __first, _Sent __last, const _Type& =
__value, _Proj __proj =3D {}) {
>>             |   ^~~~~~~~
>>       =
/usr/src/freebsd/src/contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/__algorithm/range=
s_contains.h:48:3: error: 'static constexpr bool =
std::__1::ranges::__contains::__fn::operator()(_Range&&, const _Type&, =
_Proj)' must be a non-static member function
>>          48 |   operator()(_Range&& __range, const _Type& __value, =
_Proj __proj =3D {}) {
>>             |   ^~~~~~~~
>>          Until we can get rid of gcc 12, work around this by making =
it compile
>>     libc++ in C++20 mode instead.
>>          NOTE: The resulting libc++ library will not be C++23 =
compatible! Please
>>     try to avoid shipping it, and use gcc 13 instead, if you must use =
gcc.
>>          PR:             280562
>>     MFC after:      3 days
>=20
> In this case I think we probably should drop support for GCC 12 for =
main.  Just let me
> know when you are thinking of merging libcxx 19 to stable branches so =
I can ensure they
> build with GCC 13/14 and get our CI jobs updated before then.

It depends a bit on how many ports still need to be fixed, and of course =
when 13.5 and 14.2 are done. After those I will probably do the merges.

That said, is gcc 13 good for all arches we want to support? In the past =
we still kept a few old gcc versions alive because they were the only =
one that could build for $OBSOLETE_ARCH.

-Dimitry




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4740E6A9-B104-46C5-AB19-9C5F2BF66AA3>