Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 22:11:39 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich <FreeBSD@twc.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error code 1 when building plasma5-sddm-kcm Message-ID: <15987288.vxEf1mJfsr@freebsd> In-Reply-To: <1992064.uJW0cDvVUg@t450s.local.lan> References: <mailman.73.1613736003.36285.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> <1992064.uJW0cDvVUg@t450s.local.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 19 February 2021 11:17:52 EST Walter von Entferndt wrote: > At Freitag, 19. Februar 2021, 13:00:03 CET, Steven Friedrich > > <FreeBSD@twc.com> wrote: > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/deskutils/plasma5-sddm-kcm > > I have current ports. I use svnlite update /usr/ports and > > portmaster -a. What can I do? > > Look into the buildlog. Maybe you have to tell portmaster to make the > build verbose; I do not remember, since I stopped using that tool when I > realized that *portmaster is broken by design*. Do yourself a favor & > use ports-mgmt/poudriere or ports-mgmt/synth instead & pkg delete > portmaster. They build in a fresh, clean environment; in contrast, > portmaster does not & that causes all kind of weird issues. Last not > least portmaster clutters your machine with ports or packages that are > needed as build dependency, and unless your're a developer you don't > need these otherwise. Building unjailed is only justified for self- > contained ports (those that do not need to be compiled, all is in the > ports' files/ subdirecory, some useful scripts are distributes this way) > & ports that have a very limited number of dependencies, e.g. the *-kmod > ports. This does clearly not apply to any KDE or Qt software. > > Synth may be easier for the average enduser who does not need > poudriere's advanced features (espc. build profiles). Both build tools' > performance will drastically benefit from leveraging devel/ccacche and/ > or devel/distcc. > > FYI portmaster is beeing rewritten in LUA. Once the new version is > available & stable, I will stop advocating against it (iff it also fixes > the underlying design issues). > > Feel free to file in a bug report for the doc/*-freebsd-doc: the > Handbook must not reference portmaster. It calls itself "master", while > it's procedures are (at least) naive, to say it politely. Some are > worse than O(N^2)... Thank you, sir. I took your advice and I am now using synth to build my ports. I appreciate you taking the tme to help me. -- FreeBSD FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p3 r369283 Special amd64
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15987288.vxEf1mJfsr>