From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 13:38:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:38:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from franklin-belle.com (adsl-65-68-247-73.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.68.247.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D0B43D1F for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:38:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Received: from sagea (sagea.sage-american [10.0.0.3]) by franklin-belle.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i8ODclvB097178; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:38:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jacks@sage-american.com) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20040924083845.01fa0330@sage-american.com> X-Sender: jacks@sage-american.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:38:45 -0500 To: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" , users@spamassassin.apache.org From: "Jack L. Stone" In-Reply-To: <20040924043002.Q78840@prime.gushi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (continued) X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 13:38:49 -0000 At 04:37 AM 9.24.2004 -0400, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >I've gotten a Makefile mostly tuned for sa3, based on the FreeBSD port >makefile for 2.64. I've added most of the dependencies, but FreeBSD >doesn't have ports for Net::SMTP or IP::Country::Fast, so those two >features can't be auto-installed unless the ports maintainer comes up with >them. > >I'm also not *quite* sure of the syntax for requiring a specific *version* >of a perl module from within the ports tree. > >I've added an optional WITH_SSL=yes define that will auto-ssl-ify things. > >Finally, there's a few prompts that as-of-yet cannot be bypassed, I've >opened a bug on those. > >So, suffice it to say it should be a while before we see this in the ports >tree. I'm going to send my changes along to perl@freebsd.org and see what >they think. > >-Dan > > >-- > >"Goodbye my peoples. I'll miss each one of you. Sniff-Sniff I now know >the true meaning of love. Thank you Sniff-Sniff. You are all in my >heart." > >-Chris D. > Dan: Yes, before asking my question, I did notice the ports were frozen & I also "played" with the 2.64 port without luck too. But, thought maybe someone else had some sort of time estimate for the new port. Guess we'll have to just wait patiently although that's not easy. Many thanks for the responses! Best regards, Jack L. Stone, Administrator Sage American http://www.sage-american.com jacks@sage-american.com