From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 28 13:54:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7345816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F017F43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5SDsJkm067510; Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:54:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200406281354.i5SDsJkm067510@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:54:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: kalev@colleduc.ee In-Reply-To: <40DFBC86.3070103@colleduc.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Giving up on x buffers - losing files X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 13:54:45 -0000 On 28 Jun, Kalev Lember wrote: > Arjan van Leeuwen wrote: > >> >> >> Sometimes, particularly after doing a lot of file writes (i.e. >> compiling a lot of ports, building world and mergemastering, etc), I >> get the 'Giving up on x buffers' message on shutdown, and my >> filesystems come up dirty when I restart. >> >> >> >> So, why does this happen? And how do I prevent it from happening? >> This definitely does _not_ sound like something I want my servers to >> do when 5.x goes -STABLE. > > Not sure if it is related, but if I have ext2 mounted on shutdown, the > syncer also fails and gives up on a few buffers. It is reproducable. I > can recall it was fixed about a year ago, but then broke again. This is an unrelated bug that has also been discussed. I believe it even affects read-only mounts of ext2 file systems.