From owner-freebsd-commit  Sat Apr 29 22:08:17 1995
Return-Path: commit-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA08985
          for commit-outgoing; Sat, 29 Apr 1995 22:08:17 -0700
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA08972
          for cvs-user-outgoing; Sat, 29 Apr 1995 22:08:14 -0700
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.34])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA08954
          ; Sat, 29 Apr 1995 22:07:48 -0700
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.6.9/8.6.9) id PAA13717; Sun, 30 Apr 1995 15:04:31 +1000
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 1995 15:04:31 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199504300504.PAA13717@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk, pst@shockwave.com
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/libdisk Makefile blocks.c change.c chunk.c create_chunk.c disk.c disklabel.c libdisk.h tst01.c
Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-user@freefall.cdrom.com,
        phk@freefall.cdrom.com
Sender: commit-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>Can we wait until it's used and understood first?  I'm really concerned
>about these libraries that we keep putting in that are used by only
>one piece of software.

Yes.

>It makes the "tiny FreeBSD" project a real bitch.

>One of the things I've been doing is trying to get FreeBSD on really small
>drives to use it for embedded applications.

libc having almost everything in it is more of a problem for that.  You can
easily leave out separate pieces.

Bruce