From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 18 00:19:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A2816A41F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:19:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE49043D45 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:19:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C6E1A3C2B for ; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 17:19:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4840D5129C; Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:19:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 20:19:22 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20051018001922.GA41333@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040619021700.GA27883@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040619111157.GA506@isis.wad.cz> <20051018000833.GF71766@isis.sigpipe.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051018000833.GF71766@isis.sigpipe.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: Change to INDEX format X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 00:19:25 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 02:08:33AM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # neuhauser@chello.cz / 2004-06-19 13:11:57 +0200: > > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-06-18 19:17:00 -0700: > > > This patch extends the format of the INDEX file to separately list > > > FETCH_DEPENDS, EXTRACT_DEPENDS and PATCH_DEPENDS instead of lumping > > > them all together with BUILD_DEPENDS. > >=20 > > Do you think this needs to be reflected in the 'search' target in > > bsd.port.subdir.mk? >=20 > I'm updating Mk/bsd.port.subdir.mk to make searching and display > of the 11th to 13th field possible, and I have a question: what > should happen to the default display? Should the F-deps, E-deps, > P-deps fields be displayed by default? Probably, I guess. Kris --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDVD+JWry0BWjoQKURAlUYAKC6OjqtHy3eIKmVa6ekZC1CeT37YACg4cWg 2M4tgG2zoFEo3i7YdKlks68= =6h1k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--