From owner-freebsd-current  Sat May 24 01:12:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA13215
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 24 May 1997 01:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp (afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp [131.113.212.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA13204
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 24 May 1997 01:12:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from hosokawa@localhost) by afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp (8.7.4+2.6Wbeta6/3.4W5-ntc_mailserver1.02) id RAA27050; Sat, 24 May 1997 17:12:27 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 24 May 1997 17:12:27 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <199705240812.RAA27050@afs.ntc.mita.keio.ac.jp>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
Cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG,
        hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp
Subject: Re: cd9660 w/ Joliet extensions 
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 24 May 1997 00:55:20 -0700.
	<2827.864460520@time.cdrom.com>
From: hosokawa@ntc.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi)
X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.18PL3] 1994-08/01(Mon)
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Hmmm.  I've had many people tell me that they're very very happy that
>> the FreeBSD CD does not have an autorun.inf file and that this feature
>> is the most evil thing they ever experienced in Win95. :-)

I think that autorun.inf does not harmful if autorun.inf does not
autorun :-) any executables (I use it only for menu and icon).

hosokawa