From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 21 19:45:23 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA6116A967
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 May 2006 19:45:22 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBA3943D45
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Sun, 21 May 2006 19:45:21 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4LJjK5u089094;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 15:45:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.3P/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k4LJjIC9011038
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sun, 21 May 2006 15:45:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.0.20060521154316.11bd2598@64.7.153.2>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 15:45:16 -0400
To: bv@wjv.com
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20060521154917.GB2053@wjv.com>
References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060519110026.05820230@64.7.153.2>
	<Pine.BSF.3.96.1060520014045.15967A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
	<6.2.3.4.0.20060519121104.1126b480@64.7.153.2>
	<20060521092602.GB20262@uk.tiscali.com>
	<6.2.3.4.0.20060521104147.081af2d8@64.7.153.2>
	<20060521154917.GB2053@wjv.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: improving transport over lossy links ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 19:45:27 -0000

At 11:49 AM 21/05/2006, Bill Vermillion wrote:

>And when performing fax from email - using sendmail incoming and
>routing to fax [in the early days of the current 'net before many
>people had 'net connections] the MT's were the only ones that
>worked with virtually ever target fax machine.

Thanks, I have used them in the past.  They are certainly quite a bit 
more expensive than the USRs (3x) but I might be able to justify it 
if they really do perform a lot better.

         ---Mike