From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 10 15:29:21 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6041065693;
	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [80.249.188.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08AD48FC0A;
	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:29:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (89.112.15.178.pppoe.eltel.net
	[89.112.15.178]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
	by ftp.translate.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0C22513DF48;
	Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:29:20 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:29:15 +0300
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1272967424.20101210182915@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D02413F.8020007@freebsd.org>
References: <1365605559.20101210162253@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<4D023DB7.9080509@freebsd.org> <4D02413F.8020007@freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Where userland read/write requests, whcih is larger than MAXPHYS,
	are splitted?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:29:21 -0000

Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 10 =E4=E5=EA=E0=E1=F0=FF 2010 =E3., 18:03:27:

> on 10/12/2010 16:48 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> But maybe I misunderstood your question and you talked about a different=
 I/O layer
>> or different I/O path.
> Oh, probably you talk about physread/physwrite =3D=3D physio.
> Indeed, it issues bio-s with max size of si_iosize_max and runs them sequ=
entially.
   Yep,  I'm  talking  about  this  case.  See my message to Alexander
Motin  with  explanation why I think sequential processing here is not
good idea.

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru>