From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 13 21:12:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E7E4D46 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-in-3.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm299.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5BF91708 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:12:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (vm136.rz.uni-osnabrueck.de [131.173.16.11]) by mail-in-3.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4DLCHPk002883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 23:12:17 +0200 Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private (p5DC4C58C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.196.197.140]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-auth.serv.Uni-Osnabrueck.DE (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t4DLCFof012140 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 23:12:16 +0200 Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 808D34A033A1 for ; Wed, 13 May 2015 23:12:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 23:12:05 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/firefox really depends on security/openssl? Message-ID: <20150513231205.291fe011@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: <55534973.60701@gmail.com> References: <20150509125643.0bda93e6@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <554EEBB5.8010304@rawbw.com> <20150511202110.34e6e29c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55510C22.9050900@rawbw.com> <20150512000259.32a44ec4@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55512E8F.8040508@rawbw.com> <20150512022857.7230c163@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55515251.5040503@rawbw.com> <20150512112505.5f36f0b2@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <5551DB5A.7090508@rawbw.com> <20150513012435.1912fdc2@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <55533883.8010900@gmail.com> <55534973.60701@gmail.com> Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.5.13.201816 (Univ. Osnabrueck) X-PMX-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report= HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_900_999 0, FROM_NAME_PHRASE 0, RDNS_POOLED 0, RDNS_SUSP 0, RDNS_SUSP_SPECIFIC 0, REFERENCES 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __RDNS_POOLED_10 0, __REFERENCES 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS X-PMX-Spam-Level: IIIIIIII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 21:12:28 -0000 On Wed, 13 May 2015 08:54:11 -0400 Ernie Luzar wrote: > Maybe it takes a PR to shine light on this problem as the subject of > this post is no longer valid Yes, discussion has shifted far away from topic. I would really appreciate this issue beeing on the todo list of the FreeBSD project. When thinking about a suitable subject of such a PR containing "OpenSSL" I am getting aware of my limited FreeBSD knowledge and experience. And the situation is even getting worse when thinking about the content of this PR. I even feel that such an important issue cannot even be categorized the right way within FreeBSD Bugzilla as it is affecting both base system and ports. Does anybody feel more experienced with this topic. Or should we first start a mailing list or forum thread where we can collect main issues and suggestions that can later be incorporated into a PR? Peter