Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 11:00:41 -0600 From: Matthew Reimer <mreimer@vpop.net> To: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threading code review please. Message-ID: <3E832E39.7040306@vpop.net> In-Reply-To: <lists.freebsd.arch.Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030327100013.37107G-100000@fledge.watson.org> References: <lists.freebsd.arch.3E82F7EE.6080802@tcoip.com.br> <lists.freebsd.arch.Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030327100013.37107G-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson wrote: > > Both 1:1 and M:N threading will improve performance of interactive > applications if they spend any moderate amount of time I/O bound. I've > noticed substantial performance differences between instances of > openoffice linked for libc_r and openoffice linked for linuxthreads -- > serializing I/O operations substantially impacts throughput and > interactivty due to latency. Try running the Linux-linked mozilla, the > FreeBSD libc_r mozilla, and the FreeBSD linuxthreads mozilla and see how > they compare. Where can one find a FreeBSD linuxthreads mozilla? Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E832E39.7040306>