From owner-freebsd-current Fri Apr 11 02:39:46 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA06911 for current-outgoing; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 02:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ravenock.cybercity.dk (ravenock.cybercity.dk [194.16.57.32]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA06906 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 02:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by ravenock.cybercity.dk (8.8.5/8.7.3) id LAA09877; Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:35:21 +0200 (MET DST) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <199704110935.LAA09877@ravenock.cybercity.dk> Subject: Re: OK, who broke man? In-Reply-To: from Bob Bishop at "Apr 11, 97 09:06:07 am" To: rb@gid.co.uk (Bob Bishop) Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 11:35:21 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Bob Bishop who wrote: > > Something else to worry about: I've been whingeing about slow builds with > -current kernels later than about Mar 20. > > Building the kernel for ctm src-cur 2835 using an old (20 Mar) kernel takes > 28:32 here, but the same build atop a 2835 kernel takes 3:18:34 :-( > > Since there hasn't been a public outcry, I have to assume there's some > local factor. My -current machine is a 486 ISA with an Adaptec 1542CF and > 20Mb, so I guess it could be bounce-buffer related. I'm prepared to go > digging if someone will give me a clue... Hmm, you must have some local murphy field active, I can still build a kernel just under 2 mins, and a world well under 2 hours, so.. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..