Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2008 08:18:05 -0800 From: Sam Leffler <sam@freebsd.org> To: "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <gaijin.k@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org>, Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: powerd algorithms enhancements Message-ID: <49146A3D.2020400@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <1226065673.1210.9.camel@RabbitsDen> References: <491208D3.2050901@FreeBSD.org> <20081107033524.A70117@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <1226065673.1210.9.camel@RabbitsDen>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-07 at 16:20 +1100, Ian Smith wrote:
>
>> sam's concerns seem tied in with the same kernel
>> cpu freq setting stuff, so I gather all that is connected long term ..
>>
>
> Just to make sure all facts are spelled out: I have had reliable
> livelocks with ath + powerd on RELENG_7 with HAL 0.9.x.x. I have not
> seen single livelock since pulling HAL 0.10.5.10 in from -CURRENT. So
> ath is not that lily-white in that regard either.
>
>
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49146A3D.2020400>