From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 13 19:25:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B2016A4CE for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:25:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137FC43D2F for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:25:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (a710752693ed95a6c0c016ed7d7385f5@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2E3Oh3g024758; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:24:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 399A2535DE; Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:25:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 19:25:45 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Hugo Message-ID: <20040314032545.GA99870@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <17949.212.113.164.104.1079227560.squirrel@mail.6s-gaming.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17949.212.113.164.104.1079227560.squirrel@mail.6s-gaming.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: single threaded apps on dual cpu's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 03:25:48 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 02:26:00AM +0100, Hugo wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have a doubt. I just read on a forum that a single threaded application > will only use one CPU. Reading ULE's descriptive paper, I think this is > wrong. It IS possible for a single threaded app to use both CPUs, who are > sharing the load amongst themselves, right? No. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAU9C4Wry0BWjoQKURAnFgAKC710HsfmlKDTalIeGym22R1puYlACfey3a itRePNP+heRXVxw6Bu3/0kg= =xbRO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--