From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 28 19:48:43 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808B96A9;
 Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:48:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54CED648CF;
 Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:48:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.113] (c-174-61-88-207.hsd1.fl.comcast.net
 [174.61.88.207])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFFF435C7;
 Sun, 28 Dec 2014 13:48:31 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <54A05E8E.20802@marino.st>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 20:48:30 +0100
From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st>
Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= <des@des.no>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r370220 - in head/biology: . ncbi-blast
References: <201410062016.s96KGZP8084850@svn.freebsd.org>	<86r3vjg054.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <54A04955.3010601@marino.st>	<86387zfur3.fsf@nine.des.no>
 <54A05AB7.3020200@marino.st> <86sifzef1i.fsf@nine.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <86sifzef1i.fsf@nine.des.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, jwbacon@tds.net,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2014 19:48:43 -0000

On 12/28/2014 20:43, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> writes:
>>> The original BLAST is at 2.2.26, while BLAST+ is at 2.2.30.
>> so what?  a PORTEPOCH is matched to a specific package name.
> 
> Yes, and this name cannot be used for the original BLAST program without
> bumping PORTEPOCH.  This port should have been named ncbi-blast-plus or
> something similar.

This is just an opinion.  There is no technical basis for bumping
PORTEPOCH.  To boil this down, you are saying the port has a misleading
name and should have been named something else by Jason who submitted
the PR to add the port.

John