Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Apr 2004 12:35:24 -0400
From:      Randy Pratt <rpratt1950@earthlink.net>
To:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
Cc:        gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: xchat2 - perl plugin makes xchat2 core dump
Message-ID:  <20040430123524.4b5d558b.rpratt1950@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <1083310148.34435.22.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
References:  <20040428154749.59a5584f.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> <1083227674.58600.55.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040429090903.0f4b6fe2.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> <1083258798.846.24.camel@gyros> <20040429141242.7243c54c.rpratt1950@earthlink.net> <1083310148.34435.22.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 03:29:09 -0400
Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 14:12, Randy Pratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:13:18 -0400
> > Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote:
> > 
> > <snip other discussion>
> > 
> > > Send me the script you're using, and let me know exactly the steps
> > > you're using.  I don't have any xchat Perl scripts.  Perhaps there is a
> > > problem with using the plug-in.
> > > 
> > > Joe
> > 
> > I renamed my ~/.xchat2 directory and tried a clean startup.  And I
> > can load the perl.so module without crashing xchat2.  Note that the
> > warning about not being able to preload is still present, but it
> > does not crash:
> > 
> >    AutoLoad failed for:
> >    /usr/X11R6/lib/xchat/plugins/perl.so
> > 
> >    No xchat_plugin_init symbol; is this really an xchat plugin?
> > 
> > The perl script I was using was an fserve:
> > 
> >   http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~awerth/obsidian/
> > 
> > The version I was successfully using prior to the last ports update was:
> > 
> >   http://homepages.tu-darmstadt.de/~awerth/obsidian/obsidian-0.9.2-pre1.tar.gz
> > 
> > I have tried other versions but with the same results.  I also
> > tried a couple of other perl scripts including the one that comes
> > with the distribution:
> > 
> >   /usr/ports/irc/xchat2/work/xchat-2.0.8/plugins/perl/sample_script.pl
> > 
> > I can load the perl.so module, but trying to use any perl script
> > causes the core dump.  So I'm not sure its the perl scripts.
> > 
> > Again, thanks for looking at this!
> 
> I did some more digging, and this looks like a Perl bug.  I would
> recommend sticking with 5.8.2.  Previous versions of xchat didn't use
> newCONSTSUB which seems to have a problem in perl 5.6.1.  I looked at
> some other code that uses this function, and I can't figure out why
> xchat doesn't work, but I was able to figure out there is a bug in Perl
> 5.6 related to the DynaLoader and shared objects.
> 
> Joe

Here is a summary of what I think needs to be done to get the perl.so
plugin to work for xchat2:

  # pkg_delete perl-5.6.1_15
  # cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 && make install clean
  # use.perl port
  # portupgrade -f 'xchat2'

I don't think any of the perl modules show Perl as a dependency
but the paranoid side of me is nagging me that maybe they should
be updated like:

  # portupgrade -fr 'p5-*'

Would this be necessary after changing Perl versions? 
 
On a similar note, I started checking run dependencies for xchat2
and ran into some disparities between different sources of
information which I'm at a loss to explain.

My 4-STABLE box (ports updated 28 Apr 04) "make run-depends-list"
shows no dependencies on either Perl or Perl modules.  The online
ports tree shows a dependency on p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1 but not Perl:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=xchat2&stype=all&release=4.9-STABLE%2Fi386

My 5-CURRENT box (ports updated 20 Apr 04) "make run-depends-list"
shows a dependency on /usr/ports/lang/perl5 (not perl5.8).  Again
the online ports tree is different and shows p5-XML-Parser-2.34_1
and perl-5.8.2_5 as dependencies:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/ports.cgi?query=xchat2&stype=all&release=5.2-CURRENT%2Fi386

I can perhaps understand that there may be differences between 
INDEX and INDEX-5 for the different branches, but I would think that
the online information should agree.  Needless to say, it has left
me in a somewhat confused state.

Can these differences be accounted for?

Thanks,

Randy
-- 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040430123524.4b5d558b.rpratt1950>