Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 08:02:29 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: purely package-based/oriented solution Message-ID: <20080424080229.114632lxyo7mbi4g@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <1208957957.58820.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <480E3F5E.3060501@icyb.net.ua> <1208903822.1548.62.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> <480F3B39.3090702@icyb.net.ua> <1208957957.58820.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> (from Wed, 23 Apr 2008 =20 15:39:17 +0200): > Andriy Gapon p=C3=AD=C5=A1e v st 23. 04. 2008 v 16:35 +0300: >> BTW, strange thing: >> $ portupgrade -a -PP >> ... >> ** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/linux_kdump: >> does not build with the default linux base, use the package inste= ad >> >> What's this about? :-) I do say to use packages only. > > Guess portupgrade still looks at the ports tree. What happens if you try > to rm -rf /usr/ports first? If someone knows a better way of handling this (using something else =20 than IGNORE, with the same effect to people trying to build it from =20 ports but with a better behavior when used with portupgrade -PP), I'am =20 all ears (a better way of fixing this would be to include preparsed =20 linux stuff, but there are more important things on my TODO list...). Bye, Alexander. --=20 An aphorism is never exactly true; it is either a half-truth or one-and-a-half truths. =09=09-- Karl Kraus http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080424080229.114632lxyo7mbi4g>