From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 27 01:13:19 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134CD106564A for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:13:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FD98FC1C for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:13:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so4668578wyj.13 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:13:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=pMj3yLzZMjuC1UuxAkCdIfwa01cpBxOCsEnqHwGmbZg=; b=eqI4D8eT7N3br345/eGipwp10wIwCVW8fG9ngikc9bwM9mYcPhX1gyyCRKrpBg5Rdf w/88+sC2nnQptr0fYMDqLiN4srdcYfCCUkCupMbYwi+k4ebnTlTGpn5daQ9NwTEj/LXW CLDhCtfJrY8Azra6LKw1aQkPRrh4DD6WZsr/Y= Received: by 10.227.195.77 with SMTP id eb13mr5322623wbb.79.1317085997248; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:13:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: lists@eitanadler.com Received: by 10.227.116.195 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:12:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201109262324.p8QNO0NN070853@freefall.freebsd.org> <4E811FF7.7010607@a1poweruser.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:12:47 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KM712gnZyotp9xW1azINHUBNFns Message-ID: To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 01:13:19 -0000 > The alternative is to fix burncd or backout the acd0 to cd0 change from 9.0 > which may be the most desired solution because its obvious that no one > researched the impact this change may have. This change may impact many > ports that access cd/dvd drives for read and write access. burncd may be a > very small worm in a large can of big worms. This should be discussed on a mailing list and only one mailing list. Please don't cross post. I'm leaving it on -current because it seems the the most appropriate of all the lists CCed. Please don't CC me on replies unless a consensus is reached (and the PR needs to be changed). -- Eitan Adler Ports committer Bugbusting team