From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 16 14:44:46 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190A216A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 May 2005 14:44:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from parrot.aev.net (host29-15.pool8174.interbusiness.it
	[81.74.15.29])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6085643DBD
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 May 2005 14:44:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-245-23.37-151.net24.it [151.37.23.245])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by parrot.aev.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4GEmV6m018330
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 May 2005 16:48:39 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Received: from [10.1.2.18] (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by soth.ventu (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4GEhV9T007060
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);
	Mon, 16 May 2005 16:43:31 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ml.diespammer@netfence.it)
Message-ID: <4288B1C4.9030806@netfence.it>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 16:44:20 +0200
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml.diespammer@netfence.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050502)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <4286313A.3080102@netfence.it>
	<eu9d81doft5cn61br59aimchmgeg471e8g@4ax.com> <428873A1.1060209@netfence.it>
	<9f2h819gnc2938un66cpouvnrbti39adsv@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <9f2h819gnc2938un66cpouvnrbti39adsv@4ax.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 192.168.2.2
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 10.1.2.13
Subject: Re: NFS read-ahead?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 14:44:46 -0000

Mike Tancsa wrote:

> 	Offhand, not really, but if you look around via google for
> mount_nfs freebsd "-r" a lot of people suggest r=32768,-w=32768.
> Perhaps use that as a starting point and experiment to see what gives
> you the best performance for your situation.

Tried this: with simple tests it doesn't seem to make any difference.
I guess I'll have to investigate further.
Thanks for now.

  bye
	av.