From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu May 28 17:12:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA00915 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 17:12:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00867 for ; Thu, 28 May 1998 17:12:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA13242; Thu, 28 May 1998 17:12:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199805290012.RAA13242@austin.polstra.com> To: danj@3skel.com Subject: Re: Load avg 0.33 and 99.2% idle... In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 17:12:18 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , Dan Janowski wrote: > > The odd part is that I hadn't noticed this before. I > just upgraded to 2.2.6 from 2.2.1. Maybe it's X or some > other daemon that is running differently. The "asclock" program is the usual offender. Take a peek at its source code and you'll see why. :-O -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message