Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Oct 2016 15:01:37 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu>
Cc:        ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: qa.sh stripped warning
Message-ID:  <3c630974-d033-6ecf-28ba-ea873123f89e@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaHm1a0Hz-=HPt59pZ8%2BjQEsX4s=vsc_izg9iyw6OObWEg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CACNAnaH=bfFDy0rgO2_VPtx3U6k6uwM1HneVbR-S0YztXYsr3A@mail.gmail.com> <a7c84b19-0b61-0584-0bad-ef0ecfc2864c@FreeBSD.org> <CACNAnaHm1a0Hz-=HPt59pZ8%2BjQEsX4s=vsc_izg9iyw6OObWEg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--jWgIBVvop45trBCIGD6v6nBpauQ2iPkbQ
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CKGWdfKEN8vlsQWTdvCCFnfIA04gc3Lcn";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To: Kyle Evans <kevans91@ksu.edu>
Cc: ports-list freebsd <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <3c630974-d033-6ecf-28ba-ea873123f89e@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: qa.sh stripped warning
References: <CACNAnaH=bfFDy0rgO2_VPtx3U6k6uwM1HneVbR-S0YztXYsr3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <a7c84b19-0b61-0584-0bad-ef0ecfc2864c@FreeBSD.org>
 <CACNAnaHm1a0Hz-=HPt59pZ8+jQEsX4s=vsc_izg9iyw6OObWEg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaHm1a0Hz-=HPt59pZ8+jQEsX4s=vsc_izg9iyw6OObWEg@mail.gmail.com>

--CKGWdfKEN8vlsQWTdvCCFnfIA04gc3Lcn
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le 12/10/2016 =C3=A0 20:15, Kyle Evans a =C3=A9crit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:35 AM, Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrot=
e:
>> The warning will never be turned into errors. Maybe add a comment to t=
he
>> makefile saying that files must not be stripped. Maybe a bit like go
>> ports do it, something like:
>>
>> STRIP=3D # Elf firmwares, do not strip
> Thanks for the suggestion! I've implemented this. Given the strong
> wording you've used here (will never be turned into errors), would you
> consider revising the comment @
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/Scripts/qa.sh?view=3Dmarkup#l1=
91
> ? It's easy to derive uncertainty from the wording used in the
> comment.

Well, one day, soon(tm), stripping will be done some other way, allowing
the debug symbols to be extracted into a debug package, something like:
<pkgbase>-debug.<pkgversion>.
So, while it won't be an error, it may be done automatically, and if
parts need to not be stripped, it should be noted right now :-)

--=20
Mathieu Arnold



--CKGWdfKEN8vlsQWTdvCCFnfIA04gc3Lcn--

--jWgIBVvop45trBCIGD6v6nBpauQ2iPkbQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=b6ed
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jWgIBVvop45trBCIGD6v6nBpauQ2iPkbQ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3c630974-d033-6ecf-28ba-ea873123f89e>