From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Mar 15 14:42:33 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA00535 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 14:42:33 -0800
Received: from netcom14.netcom.com (root@netcom14.netcom.com [192.100.81.126]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA00529 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 14:42:32 -0800
Received: by netcom14.netcom.com (8.6.10/Netcom)
	id LAA11464; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 11:56:53 -0800
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 11:56:53 -0800
From: hasty@netcom.com (Amancio Hasty Jr)
Message-Id: <199503151956.LAA11464@netcom14.netcom.com>
To: gclarkii@phoenix.net, hasty@netcom.com
Subject: Re: tkperl?
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>The reason 4.X was chosen was for the simple fact 5.0 was still in beta/alpha
> and I did not want to have to handle the patch of the week syndrome.
>Gary

I wish you had chosen tcl/tk ... The install program could have been
written in tcl/tk 

And no I am not going to get into a debate of tcl/tk vs. perl ...

	Cheers,
	Amancio