From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 8 16:14:30 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA16914 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 16:14:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA16908 for ; Mon, 8 Jul 1996 16:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (sendmail/PALMER-2) with ESMTP id AAA26103; Tue, 9 Jul 1996 00:13:47 +0100 (BST) To: tcg@ime.net cc: Michael Searle , questions@freefall.freebsd.org From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Ports suggestion In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Jul 1996 18:55:52 EDT." <31E191F8.20CD@ime.net> Date: Tue, 09 Jul 1996 00:13:46 +0100 Message-ID: <26101.836867626@palmer.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Gary Chrysler wrote in message ID <31E191F8.20CD@ime.net>: > Aye, I kinda like that, Although not many of the ports I have > added have the packing list. (As you called it) They are ALL meant to have them, as that is how the packages are built ... if they just have subdirectories in them (which some do, and is a bit of a cheat), then they should be fixed to have complete packing lists ... otherwise you cannot pkg_delete them :-( Gary -- Gary Palmer FreeBSD Core Team Member FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info