From owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 22 08:55:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4021716A4BF for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:55:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AE143FB1 for ; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 08:55:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martin@duskware.de) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19qEFj-0007OJ-00 for freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:55:03 +0200 Received: from [217.82.92.231] (helo=drowsy.duskware.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 19qEFj-0000AQ-00 for freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:55:03 +0200 Received: by drowsy.duskware.de (Postfix, from userid 205) id 91BB133B01; Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:55:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 17:55:02 +0200 From: Martin Husemann To: Gary Jennejohn Message-ID: <20030822155502.GL400@drowsy.duskware.de> References: <20030820115654.GA38767@pc5.i.0x5.de> <200308201521.h7KFL8ra015997@peedub.jennejohn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200308201521.h7KFL8ra015997@peedub.jennejohn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Helge Oldach <3321861203@oldach.net> cc: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to influence the number transmitted after connecting X-BeenThere: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Using ISDN with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 15:55:05 -0000 On Wed, Aug 20, 2003 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > This was already explained in an earlier mail. The telco's switch uses > the first number of the MSNs as the caller number in the SETUP. > > Give it up, you can't influence it. I'm not realy sure. I think this happens because we don't send any number in i4b_l3_tx_connect(). If we would send a 0x4c IE with the wanted number there, I guess the switch would accept that (but I haven't tried it). Martin