From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 23:48:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290B916A40F for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nuno.antunes@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5462843CC2 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nuno.antunes@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so683735nfc for ; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:48:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SFvE87Cf3aDVCt8CCu0R3O0JP9jA+po668AviImNbv/S6gqT+KSmyyTdHj6qDZF6t9Ft5w+S1d4jmdT9HEGW803U0WGTzPJ0/Yo619gXQ8C3KGNNpeRVwWB9RDKR3yrIY5ygrBVWhg8Pt7jNSVoC1tJLAJ9D9WQ1RK96TCipNhw= Received: by 10.49.57.1 with SMTP id j1mr2990644nfk.1165448882114; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 15:48:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.63.15 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 15:48:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <262949390612061548n5d9899bfk49b8553db40b428d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 23:48:02 +0000 From: "Nuno Antunes" To: "Max Laier" In-Reply-To: <200612062321.14202.max@love2party.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <262949390612061256k23dc56b1o7e8a76c033fdd021@mail.gmail.com> <200612062321.14202.max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Reporting 2 LORs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 23:48:09 -0000 On 12/6/06, Max Laier wrote: > The second should be fixed in current as of if_iwi.c rev. 1.43 The first > one seems strange and on first glance like a false positive (possibly as > a result of the second), but please keep me posted if it keeps showing > up. Thanks. > I confirm. Both are gone after upgrading. Thanks! Nuno