Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 04:37:21 -0700 (PDT) From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> To: Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net>, alane@FreeBSD.org, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports List <ports@FreeBSD.org>, Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> Subject: Re: Shouldn't xmms-pipe be under audio, with all the other xmms-* plugins? Message-ID: <20020826113721.95663.qmail@web13501.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20020826050913.I2666-100000@blues.jpj.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
There is a lot of grey area there, we have xmms plugins scattered all over the place... Although most of the vis plugins are under ports/graphics I noticed windowmaker has its own category. Should xmms have one also? xmms-pipe doesn't actually require a sound card or have anything to do with sound, and either does xmms-alarm, although xmms-alarm is something that provides a clock that requires X... --- Trevor Johnson <trevor@jpj.net> wrote: > > It seems to me that xmms-pipe is in the wrong place by being put under > > misc, and that it should go under audio, where all the other xmms-* > > things live. Since it's new, it should be a lot less painful to move it > > than if it had a real history. I'd just do it, by removing and adding, > > except that (1) I wanted at least 1 concurring opinion, and (2) I didn't > > know for sure if repocopy was the more correct way or if I can just > > whack it and re-add it. > > It makes sense to me, because xmms is an audio player and xmmspipe is only > for use with xmms. The repo copy is skipped for things that have no > history, just as you say. > -- > Trevor Johnson > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes http://finance.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020826113721.95663.qmail>