From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Aug 20 1:12:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca44-42.ix.netcom.com [209.111.212.170]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EBB15214; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 01:11:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id BAA87776; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 01:11:05 -0700 (PDT) To: Nik Clayton Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj.docbook.mk cruft, naming, splitting References: <19990819141916.A36423@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 20 Aug 1999 01:11:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: Nik Clayton's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:19:16 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Nik Clayton * I think it would be nice if the FDP Makefile's drew from, but did not * depend on, the system make files in /usr/share/mk. It would be nice if * doc/ was completely self contained, so that you could download it on to * pretty much any FreeBSD system and have it build (as long as the * appropriate apps are in place). * * Don't get me wrong -- I think we can still lever a lot of the work that's * gone in to the bsd.*.mk files, and I think we should. But having * * doc/share/mk/fdp.own.mk * fdp.docbook.mk * fdp.install.mk * fdp.subdir.mk * * and so on makes it simpler to transport the doc tree to other systems. * Ultimately, all you should need to move is doc//* and doc//*. Good idea. All the *BSD's have moved bsd.port.mk out of /usr/share/mk and into /usr/ports -- there is no reason why the doc tree can't do the same, for pretty much the same reasons. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message