Date: 20 Aug 1999 01:11:05 -0700 From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj.docbook.mk cruft, naming, splitting Message-ID: <vqc4shu50ti.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Nik Clayton's message of "Thu, 19 Aug 1999 14:19:16 %2B0100" References: <19990819141916.A36423@kilt.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> * I think it would be nice if the FDP Makefile's drew from, but did not * depend on, the system make files in /usr/share/mk. It would be nice if * doc/ was completely self contained, so that you could download it on to * pretty much any FreeBSD system and have it build (as long as the * appropriate apps are in place). * * Don't get me wrong -- I think we can still lever a lot of the work that's * gone in to the bsd.*.mk files, and I think we should. But having * * doc/share/mk/fdp.own.mk * fdp.docbook.mk * fdp.install.mk * fdp.subdir.mk * * and so on makes it simpler to transport the doc tree to other systems. * Ultimately, all you should need to move is doc/<lang>/* and doc/<share>/*. Good idea. All the *BSD's have moved bsd.port.mk out of /usr/share/mk and into /usr/ports -- there is no reason why the doc tree can't do the same, for pretty much the same reasons. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqc4shu50ti.fsf>