Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2023 21:07:49 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 69d94f4c7608 - main - Add tarfs, a filesystem backed by tarballs. Message-ID: <Y91bhWWhBrkQCjeN@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <86y1pf2k1g.fsf@ltc.des.no> References: <202302021720.312HKDQG099212@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <Y9xIru3YZp9ROjzD@kib.kiev.ua> <86y1pf2k1g.fsf@ltc.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 03, 2023 at 10:08:27AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> writes: > > In tarfs_reclaim(), neither vnode_destroy_vobject() nor cache_purge() calls > > are not needed. > > Does this also apply to tarfs_zreclaim()? This is true for any VOP_RECLAIM implementation. vgonle() handles cache purge. Also it handles VM-related cleanup and buffer cache cleanup, in the correct order.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Y91bhWWhBrkQCjeN>