From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 4 17:30:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA08114 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:30:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from logues.rhn.orst.edu (logues.RHN.ORST.EDU [128.193.139.116]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA08105 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:30:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from logues.rhn.orst.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by logues.rhn.orst.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA06078; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 17:30:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <32F7E2AA.59E2B600@engr.orst.edu> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 1997 17:30:18 -0800 From: Steve Logue X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-970201-GAMMA0 i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joerg Wunsch CC: John Hay , stenn@whimsy.udel.edu, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xntp3-5.89.2 & FreeBSD 2.2-GAMMA won't compile References: <32F7097D.41C67EA6@engr.orst.edu> <199702041034.MAA13094@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk J Wunsch wrote: > > As John Hay wrote: > > (xtnp problems) > > > I have fixed it in FreeBSD-current, but weren't sure if it should go into > > 2.2. Any opinions anyone? > > > If somebody from the 2.2 release team give the go-ahead I would be > > happy to put it in 2.2. > > Barring any objections from other partys in say, the next couple of > days, go ahead. (Do you know how to do branch commits?) > > Please, see also PR # bin/2469. I think the designated solution to > the problem was to introduce a LOG_NTP facility. Somebody needs to > track this, or it will be forgotten. (I really need it, right now, > i've hacked xntpd locally to log the annoying messages at LOG_DEBUG > level.) > What about all the xntpd 3.4e code in the src of FreeBSD - that needs to be replace while we're at it? Thanks -STEVEl > cheers, J"org > > joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE > Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)