From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 06:02:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7855916A4BF for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:02:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B4644025 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:02:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h8TD2IgG028463; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:02:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:02:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Dan Langille In-Reply-To: <3F77D27E.6203.3321BA14@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] : libc_r/uthread/uthread_write.c X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:02:20 -0000 On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Sep 2003 at 7:50, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > Right, this seems correct to me. > > All our testing on this patch has been successful. I'm going to do a > few more tests on different hardware under 4.8-stable. > > What's the next step? Commit it? Get others to test with it first? Sure, it looks good enough to commit. > > > > > The problem found when running under pthreads on 4.8-stable [i.e. > > > EOT is not returned to the application code] is not found with libkse > > > on 5.1-current. > > FWIW: our regression tests are failing under 5.1 and we suspect that > MTIOCERRSTAT ioctl() has changed since 4.8. We're getting: > > btape: dev.c:1119 Doing MTIOCERRSTAT errno=22 ERR=Invalid argument > > We'll continue with our 5.1 work, but we'd like to finish up with 4.8 > ASAP. Well, I can commit it to -current first, then it can go into -stable. I'm not sure about the ioctl, though. -- Dan Eischen