From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 27 15:09:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52788106564A; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CB88FC0C; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 172A734D404; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:09:06 +0000 (GMT) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice & Vision To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, bf1783@gmail.com Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:09:05 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.5.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201012271509.06009.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: ImageMagick, Djvu, and Perl-threaded - marked as IGNORE when updating X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:09:43 -0000 > > > > > What concerns me is perl-threaded _is_ installed but it can't see > > > > > it. > > > > > > > > Do you have in: > > > > > > > > etc/make.conf > > > > > > > > PERL_THREADED=true > > > > > > Perhaps I'm a little daft atm. Either way I want to be clear: Are you > > > saying the define needs to be in the make.conf so that it will build > > > correctly? It _does not_ actually look at what perl is installed? > > > > > > IF that is the case, then wtf? Either ImageMagick should be checking > > > the actual pkg installed, or the perl port should be defining this in > > > the make.conf, right? Seeing as perl already makes a define in > > > make.conf... > > > > > > Meanwhile I'll check it out. Cheers > > > > Yep you need that line in make.conf > > Who made this claim? This is not some standard, user-configurable > knob -- it is only used by 5 ports, and each of them assigns a value > to it in the port Makefile. It shouldn't be set in make.conf. As for > why it isn't working in Da Rock's case, he hasn't answered any of the > questions I asked him earlier. > > b. I suggest you see an earlier thread on same topic [ImageMagick Upgrade Problem]. I also wonder if the OP's ports tree is up to date. David Photographic Artist Permanent Installations & Design Creative Imagery and Advanced Digital Techniques High Dynamic Range Photography & Official Portraiture Combined darkroom & digital creations & Systems Adminstrator for the vizion2000.net network